Historical Archive
2007: June, July, August, September, October
Historical Posts for June 20, 2007
Whereas all the details are incompletos in this hour looks like that $40 million in strategic money of the companies as Intel and the T-Movable will anticipates many of site to make some things very creative. Of which I am oyendo…
Some of the rumors of the party of at night in NXTComm are yesterday that many of the companies of the technology that allow in communications are for the sale. I know of one of these companies that are having some financial problems of me I cannot only say who. To count on the consolidation. TrackBack (0) | commentaries (0) | labels with of .icio.us | VoIP Blog - Tehrani.com | Permalink: To allow acquisitions of the technology
Labels: to allow technology, nxtcomm
Copyright VoIP Blog - Tehrani.com
BroadSoft finishes announcing will provide them its platform of BroadWorks to allow to the services of business of $cox - received communications of an IP that offered to directed corporative clients. This an enormous triumph for Broadsoft and must also be of great preoccupation to the companies of the telephone of the holder. The line communication companies have been very aggressive in the residential market of VoIP and SMBs is following. TrackBack (0) | commentaries (0) | labels with of .icio.us | VoIP Blog - Tehrani.com | Permalink: $cox selects BroadWorks VoIP
Labels: broadsoft, broadworks, $cox, received voip
Copyright VoIP Blog - Tehrani.com
Like part of the program of Covad the Blogger, Andy setup several bloggers of the industry with a T1 of Covad. Greg, Phoneboy, and the field of Ken, their experiences with using a connection of the T1 of the Internet de Covad have all the place setting. In a related note, rich Tehrani had an interview with Jeff Ahlquist, vice president of Covad of the corporative development and the strategy who is definitively worthy of the verification towards outside.
Anyyway, the last week, I made my T1 install and be formed. One of the first things that I did it was makes a speed trials of the width of band. I went to http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/ and I in line worked a test of the width of band. The first test of the direct transference worked and I obtained 1,450Kbps, that T1 of a standard-classified connection is pretty close 1.544Mbps (1544Kbps). Then the test (by waters above) of upload worked and to my shock it obtained only 444Kbps. This is not almost as quickly as it must be. I tried another Web site of the speed trials and obtained similar results.
I ignited of an email to Andy who explained my test resultses pattern and I asked to you if I received “a true” T1. It responded that it was a true T1 and that there was no way my by waters above must be that one slow one. It suggested between in contact with the technical assistance of Covad, but before I did that, I decide to play around with my rebajadora of Linksys WRT54G.
Just by chance I happened to chascar the menu of the uses and the game in admin Fabric-based Linksys and noticed a QoS picture. Ignited Chasqué the tongue-piece of QoS and I noticed it that I made QoS turn and be formed to give my “high-priority” Cisco late ATA-186 now. I fixed my ATA-186 to “high-priority” on a year ago when it had editions of the quality of VoIP with Vonage. I forgot that I rotated QoS, but surely to make QoS allow would not above affect my width of band by waters, he? The rebajadora of Linksys must be quite elegant to see that there is device of no Vonage with the packages at the moment of reception/that they transmit specified MAC address, and therefore the rebajadora must give all the width of band to any use that wishes it. Looks like logical, right?
Badly! I gave return extinguished to QoS and later I worked another test of the width of band and voila, had symmetrical speeds around 1,450Kbps. Really, by waters above it was slightly more express than in descending sense in my the first test with 1,468Kbps against 1,450Kbps. I joked with Andy, “well, is a cheap residential rebajadora of WRT54G, so I conjecture that I cannot count on QoS of normal category with the small pieces of the COUGH, the etc.” is screenshot of the demonstration of the screen of the disposition of Linksys QoS here how I made the device of Vonage TIES to fix to high-priority. (I key in for one more a greater image)
Moral of history - if you wish the QoS license of the maximum operation given dull return if it uses a rebajadora of Linksys. Looks like accountant-intuitive no?
Nevertheless, if still he had Vonage and used a pig of the width of band as client of the P2P (she emulates, Bittorent, etc.) would need to leave to QoS given return in so the packages of the voice obtain priority. It would appear because an indirect effect I would above lose rough 1,000Kbps of the width of band by waters, that really aspires. Perhaps Linksys has new softwares unalterable for the WRT54G, that solves this edition. I am working v3.03.6 at the moment.
In any case, I tested one another to verify the latency of the T1 of Covad, that is really more important that width of crude band if you are making VoIP or videoconferencia. Like test of test pattern, I whistled like an Yahoo.com bullet and the rebajadora of the T3 of TMC. Here they are the results of a test of the bullet whistle approximately 10min:
Rebajadora of the T3 of TMC
Packages: Envoy = 1075, received = 1075, lost one = 0 (loss of 0%),
Approximated round times of the trip in milliseconds:
Minimum = 10ms, maximum = 921ms, average = 100ms
Yahoo!
Statistic of the whistle of bullet for 216.109.112.135:
Packages: Envoy = 1017, received = 1016, lost one = 0 (loss of 0%),
Approximated round times of the trip in milliseconds:
Minimum = 13ms, maximum = 37ms, average = 18ms
The pretty impressive numbers of the latency, specially when to whistle like an Yahoo.com bullet since it is latency maximum was 37ms and is average was 18ms amazing. It would appear that Covad feels closely together of where Yahoo! it connects with the Internet. Obvious, since Covad is a carrier feel near main the fat pipes. Yahoo obtains massive traffic, so I am safe that they hardly connect some short jumps of the fat pipes. I am safe that both have multiple connections through country and by all means Covad has agreements that watch with Tier-1 fixedness, that guarantees that the traffic to field traverse is fast wonderful.
Total, I am very happy with my experience of the T1 of Covad. The installer was friendly and cortesano. The latency is excellent and the width of band, particularly of waters above is in favor far better that my DSL. I requested the installer of Covad about the fiber of offer of in the future next Covad, since Verizon is unfolding its service of FiOS quickly and AT&T is gangbusters that goes with their service of the Or-verse. Both competitors can provide the triple packages of the game (voice, video, data).
He mentioned it was found out Verizon FiOS and that Covad at the moment does not offer a solution of the fiber, but it made reference that FiOS helped to push Covad to provide the fiber in very near the future. I think that AT&T and Verizon are beginning to lead some of the Tier-2 carriers to provide the fiber to the home (FTTH) or to provide an approach of the hybrid-fibra/de the copper as the Or-verse of AT&T is taking. And that my friends are great the news for the residential clients that they are clamoreando for more width of band and more services in a cheap price indicate.
TrackBack (0)
| commentaries (1) | labels with of .icio.us | VoIP and adminículo Blog | Permalink: Speed of the T1 of Covad and test of the latency plus the description
Labels: width of band, Covad, latency, Linksys, QoS, speed trials, T1, Vonage, WRT54G
Copyright VoIP and adminículos Blog
